Abstract
In the late 1950s and early 1960s a variety of Americans began to protest the loss of open space to suburban sprawl. The critics of sprawl - William Whyte, most notably - argued that open space had great aesthetic, social, and ecological value. To preserve open space, activists lobbied for the acquisition of public land and touted land-saving forms of development. Although both efforts brought important successes, both proved inadequate. Even so, the open-space debate had enduring consequences: It shaped later efforts to force builders to meet new environmental obligations, and it played a key role in the evolution of the environmental movement.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 259-274 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Geographical Review |
| Volume | 88 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1998 |
Keywords
- Environmentalism
- Suburbs
- Urban planning
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'William Whyte, open space, and environmental activism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver