TY - GEN
T1 - Why regularized auto-encoders learn sparse representation?
AU - Arpit, Devansh
AU - Zhou, Yingbo
AU - Ngo, Hung Q.
AU - Govindaraju, Venu
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Sparse distributed representation is the key to learning useful features in deep learning algorithms, because not only it is an efficient mode of data representation, but also - more importantly - it captures the generation process of most real world data. While a number of regularized autoencoders (AE) enforce sparsity explicitly in their learned representation and others don't, there has been little formal analysis on what encourages sparsity in these models in general. Our objective is to formally study this general problem for regularized auto-encoders. We provide sufficient conditions on both regularization and activation functions that encourage sparsity. We show that multiple popular models (de-noising and contractive auto encoders, e.g.) and activations (rectified linear and sigmoid, e.g.) satisfy these conditions; thus, our conditions help explain sparsity in their learned representation. Thus our theoretical and empirical analysis together shed light on the properties of regularization/activation that are conductive to sparsity and unify a number of existing auto-encoder models and activation functions under the same analytical framework.
AB - Sparse distributed representation is the key to learning useful features in deep learning algorithms, because not only it is an efficient mode of data representation, but also - more importantly - it captures the generation process of most real world data. While a number of regularized autoencoders (AE) enforce sparsity explicitly in their learned representation and others don't, there has been little formal analysis on what encourages sparsity in these models in general. Our objective is to formally study this general problem for regularized auto-encoders. We provide sufficient conditions on both regularization and activation functions that encourage sparsity. We show that multiple popular models (de-noising and contractive auto encoders, e.g.) and activations (rectified linear and sigmoid, e.g.) satisfy these conditions; thus, our conditions help explain sparsity in their learned representation. Thus our theoretical and empirical analysis together shed light on the properties of regularization/activation that are conductive to sparsity and unify a number of existing auto-encoder models and activation functions under the same analytical framework.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84997712018
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84997712018
T3 - 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2016
SP - 211
EP - 223
BT - 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2016
A2 - Balcan, Maria Florina
A2 - Weinberger, Kilian Q.
PB - International Machine Learning Society (IMLS)
T2 - 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2016
Y2 - 19 June 2016 through 24 June 2016
ER -