Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Why Christians Should Not Embrace Extreme Transhumanism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Extreme transhumanism involves prolonging our existence by sustaining our mental life without all of our body’s organic parts. Christians should be wary of these aims for metaphysical, moral, and theological reasons. The metaphysical qualms are based on our being human animals rather than distinct persons. So, extreme transhumanism will eliminate rather than enhance us because animals cannot become inorganic. Even if we are persons distinct from our animals, the moral worry is that extreme enhancements of persons will kill their human animals. Appeals to double effect in making such killings unintentional will fail as one cannot intend to so reconstruct a person without intending lethally to deconstruct the animal constituting the person. The theological concerns arise because inorganic enhancements of the person could produce the death of an animal composed of organic parts. The death of the animal would mean the overlapping person would also cease to instantiate life processes. This would initiate the onset of a divinely ordained intermediate state between death and resurrection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)92-102
Number of pages11
JournalChristian Bioethics
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2025

Keywords

  • animals
  • Christianity
  • death
  • double effect
  • Neo-Lockeanism
  • persons
  • transhumanism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why Christians Should Not Embrace Extreme Transhumanism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this