Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Whose Risk? Why Did the U.S. Public Ignore Information About the Ebola Outbreak?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

To test a possible boundary condition for the risk information seeking and processing (RISP) model, this study experimentally manipulates risk perception related to the 2014 Ebola outbreak in a nationally representative sample. Multiple-group structural equation modeling results indicate that psychological distance was negatively related to systematic processing in the high-risk condition. In the low-risk condition, psychological distance was positively related to heuristic processing; negative attitude toward media coverage dampened people's need for information, which subsequently influenced information processing. Risk perception elicited more fear, which led to greater information insufficiency and more heuristic processing in the low-risk condition. In contrast, sadness was consistently related to information processing in both conditions. Model fit statistics also show that the RISP model provides a better fit to data when risk perception is elevated. Further, this study contributes to our understanding of the role of discrete emotions in motivating information processing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1708-1722
Number of pages15
JournalRisk Analysis
Volume39
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Fear
  • information processing
  • psychological distance
  • risk perception
  • sadness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Whose Risk? Why Did the U.S. Public Ignore Information About the Ebola Outbreak?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this