Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Who's who: How “women of color” are (or are not) represented in STEM education research

  • Indiana University Bloomington
  • Vanderbilt University
  • University of Missouri

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Despite national calls for increasing diversity and inclusion within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), inequitable recruitment and retention strategies remain commonplace. Inherent to many strategies is a lack of specificity in attending to the needs, desires, and cultures of individuals who are minoritized at the intersections of race, gender, and class through the use of broad, sweeping classifications such as “Women of Color.” Using critical race feminism, we engaged in a meta-synthesis of recent peer-reviewed, empirical STEM education articles that used the term “Women of Color” to identify (a) how the term “Women of Color” was defined, (b) who was and was not represented by this term and (c) and how research findings accounted for the presence of WOC. We provide a critical discussion of how terminology is used and a call for specificity in equitable and justice-oriented STEM programming.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-256
Number of pages28
JournalScience Education
Volume106
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2022

Keywords

  • STEM
  • critical race feminism
  • higher education
  • meta-synthesis
  • women of color

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who's who: How “women of color” are (or are not) represented in STEM education research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this