Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

When is it Okay to be Alone? Gender Differences in Normative Beliefs about Social Withdrawal in Emerging Adulthood

  • Carleton University
  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Informed by prior work on social withdrawal and gender role norms, the present study utilizes data from a large sample of U.S. (n = 656) and Canadian (n = 560) university students (Mage = 19.65 years) to test if the degree to which behaviors of social withdrawal are judged to be acceptable depends on (a) the motivation underlying the behavior (i.e., social withdrawal due to shyness versus unsociability versus avoidance or differences in withdrawal type) and (b) the gender of the actor (or the hypothetical person depicted as engaging in the behavior) and (c) the gender of the participant (or the observer). Results showed that participants were most accepting of unsociability, although perceptions differed somewhat according to the genders of the actor and the participant. For instance, participants were more accepting of shyness and avoidance in men but more accepting of unsociability in women. Findings have important implications for the refinement of theory and research because they highlight the need to more carefully consider the oftentimes neglected interface between social withdrawal and gender.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)482-492
Number of pages11
JournalSex Roles
Volume82
Issue number7-8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2020

Keywords

  • Avoidance
  • Gender
  • Normative beliefs
  • Shyness
  • Social withdrawal
  • Unsociability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When is it Okay to be Alone? Gender Differences in Normative Beliefs about Social Withdrawal in Emerging Adulthood'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this