Abstract
Embryo rescue cases and minimal miscarriage prevention research have been interpreted as showing that even pro-lifers are not really committed to the unborn having the same moral status as the born. I will suggest instead that judgments about embryo rescues are often distorted by triage considerations that reveal nothing about differences in moral status between those saved and those not. I will present metaphysical and ethical considerations – none assuming a difference in moral status – why preventing millions of miscarriages does not warrant the massive redistribution of research funds that would occur to prevent the deaths of equal numbers of humans already born.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 186-202 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Pacific Philosophical Quarterly |
| Volume | 101 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 1 2020 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What Must Pro-Lifers Believe About the Moral Status of Embryos?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver