Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What Makes Us Feel the Best Also Makes Us Feel the Worst: The Emotional Impact of Independent and Interdependent Experiences

    • University of California at Santa Barbara
    • University of Oklahoma

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    32 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Four studies examined the hypothesis that intense emotional experiences are more often centered on interdependent than independent experiences. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrated that when asked to write about emotionally intense events, participants were more likely to write about interdependent than independent experiences. Study 3 provided evidence that these effects were not due to recall effects based on mere exposure. Finally, Study 4 demonstrated that when asked to write about the most positive and negative interdependent and independent experiences of their lives and then rate their impact, participants were more likely to indicate that interdependent experiences had more emotional impact than independent experiences. Study 4 also provided evidence that the extent to which an experience fostered belonging motivations predicted the emotional impact of that event. Implications of the current research in terms of the need to belong and research on motivation and appraisal theories of emotion are discussed.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)44-63
    Number of pages20
    JournalSelf and Identity
    Volume10
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 2011

    Keywords

    • Appraisal theory
    • Emotion
    • Motivation
    • Need to belong

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'What Makes Us Feel the Best Also Makes Us Feel the Worst: The Emotional Impact of Independent and Interdependent Experiences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this