Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What makes plan implementation successful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zealand

  • Philip Berke
  • , Michael Backhurst
  • , Maxine Day
  • , Neil Ericksen
  • , Lucie Laurian
  • , Jan Crawford
  • , Jennifer Dixon
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • University of Waikato
  • Planning Consultants Ltd
  • The University of Auckland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

196 Scopus citations

Abstract

Failure to implement plans has long been considered a significant barrier to effective planning. We examine two conceptions of success in plan implementation (conformance and performance), the effects of the implementation practices of planning agencies, and the capacity of agencies and permit applicants to bring about success. A key lesson from our New-Zealand-based evaluation is that implementation is somewhat weak. Another key point is that, if implementation is defined and measured in terms of conformance, plans and planners have an important influence on implementation success. Alternatively, if implementation is defined and measured in terms of performance, plans and planners are less influential in implementation. These lessons have broad implications for the theory and practice of plan implementation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)581-600
Number of pages20
JournalEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What makes plan implementation successful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zealand'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this