Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What can lithics tell us about hominin technology's ‘primordial soup’? An origin of stone knapping via the emulation of Mother Nature

  • Metin I. Eren
  • , Stephen J. Lycett
  • , Michelle R. Bebber
  • , Alastair Key
  • , Briggs Buchanan
  • , Emma Finestone
  • , Joseph Benson
  • , Rebecca Biermann Gürbüz
  • , Adela Cebeiro
  • , Roman Garba
  • , Anne Grunow
  • , C. Owen Lovejoy
  • , Danielle MacDonald
  • , Erica Maletic
  • , G. Logan Miller
  • , Joseph D. Ortiz
  • , Jonathan Paige
  • , Justin Pargeter
  • , Tomos Proffitt
  • , Mary Ann Raghanti
  • Teal Riley, Jeffrey I. Rose, David M. Singer, Robert S. Walker
  • Kent State University
  • Cleveland Museum of Natural History
  • University of Cambridge
  • University of Tulsa
  • University of St Andrews
  • New York University
  • New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology
  • Czech Academy of Sciences
  • Ohio State University
  • Illinois State University
  • Center for Applied Fire and Ecosystem Science
  • University of Johannesburg
  • University of Algarve
  • British Antarctic Survey
  • University of Missouri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

The use of stone hammers to produce sharp stone flakes—knapping—is thought to represent a significant stage in hominin technological evolution because it facilitated the exploitation of novel resources, including meat obtained from medium-to-large-sized vertebrates. The invention of knapping may have occurred via an additive (i.e., cumulative) process that combined several innovative stages. Here, we propose that one of these stages was the hominin use of ‘naturaliths,’ which we define as naturally produced sharp stone fragments that could be used as cutting tools. Based on a review of the literature and our own research, we first suggest that the ‘typical’ view, namely that sharp-edged stones are seldom produced by nonprimate processes, is likely incorrect. Instead, naturaliths can be, and are being, endlessly produced in a wide range of settings and thus may occur on the landscape in far greater numbers than archaeologists currently understand or acknowledge. We then explore the potential role this ‘naturalith prevalence’ may have played in the origin of hominin stone knapping. Our hypothesis suggests that the origin of knapping was not a ‘Eureka!’ moment whereby hominins first made a sharp flake by intention or by accident and then sought something to cut, but instead was an emulative process by hominins aiming to reproduce the sharp tools furnished by mother nature and already in demand. We conclude with a discussion of several corollaries our proposal prompts, and several avenues of future research that can support or question our proposal.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S8-S30
JournalArchaeometry
Volume68
Issue numberS3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What can lithics tell us about hominin technology's ‘primordial soup’? An origin of stone knapping via the emulation of Mother Nature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this