Abstract
We generated an inventory of 27 interpersonal behaviors and examined the extent to which participants judged each behavior as cheating on a long-term partner. We predicted variation in these judgments based on participant sex and attachment insecurity. Ratings for items ranged considerably; participants rated sexual behaviors as most indicative of cheating, then erotic behaviors, followed by behaviors consistent with a romantic relationship, and then behaviors related to financial support. Women rated ten items higher than did men, and men's ratings were higher on a minor financial support item. Higher attachment anxiety was associated with higher ratings for 18 of 27 behaviors; higher attachment avoidance was associated with lower scores on five items and higher scores on one item. Principle Axis Factoring identified three dimensions; sexual interaction, behaviors indicating close relationships, and casual social interaction. We discuss these results using the framework of attachment theory and sex-specific mating strategies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 159-171 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Evolutionary Psychology |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2013 |
Keywords
- Attachment
- Cheating
- Infidelity
- Romantic relationships
- Sex differences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Was that cheating? Perceptions vary by sex, attachment anxiety, and behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver