Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Was that cheating? Perceptions vary by sex, attachment anxiety, and behavior

  • Daniel J. Kruger
  • , Maryanne L. Fisher
  • , Robin S. Edelstein
  • , William J. Chopik
  • , Carey J. Fitzgerald
  • , Sarah L. Strout
  • Saint Mary's University Halifax
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Oakland University
  • Dominican College

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Scopus citations

Abstract

We generated an inventory of 27 interpersonal behaviors and examined the extent to which participants judged each behavior as cheating on a long-term partner. We predicted variation in these judgments based on participant sex and attachment insecurity. Ratings for items ranged considerably; participants rated sexual behaviors as most indicative of cheating, then erotic behaviors, followed by behaviors consistent with a romantic relationship, and then behaviors related to financial support. Women rated ten items higher than did men, and men's ratings were higher on a minor financial support item. Higher attachment anxiety was associated with higher ratings for 18 of 27 behaviors; higher attachment avoidance was associated with lower scores on five items and higher scores on one item. Principle Axis Factoring identified three dimensions; sexual interaction, behaviors indicating close relationships, and casual social interaction. We discuss these results using the framework of attachment theory and sex-specific mating strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-171
Number of pages13
JournalEvolutionary Psychology
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2013

Keywords

  • Attachment
  • Cheating
  • Infidelity
  • Romantic relationships
  • Sex differences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Was that cheating? Perceptions vary by sex, attachment anxiety, and behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this