Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Vital staining adjuncts to determine the need for biopsy for early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma and potentially malignant disorders: An evidence summary of a living systematic review, Version 2026 1.0

  • Ankita Shashikant Bhosale
  • , Francisca Verdugo-Paiva
  • , Olivia Urquhart
  • , Carolina Martins-Pfeifer
  • , Matthias Wallach Weinstein
  • , Tanya Walsh
  • , Kelly K. O'Brien
  • , Ana María Rojas-Gómez
  • , Michael Glick
  • , Mark W. Lingen
  • , Alonso Carrasco-Labra
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Universidad del Desarrollo
  • University of Manchester
  • American Dental Association
  • Epistemonikos Foundation
  • The University of Chicago

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Improvements in disease progression and treatment can coincide with the early detection of oral potentially malignant disorders and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Although biopsy is the standard for diagnosing these conditions, adjuncts like vital staining are less invasive and could potentially indicate when biopsy is necessary. In this living systematic review, the authors summarize the diagnostic test accuracy and impact of vital staining among adults with or without lesions. Types of Studies Reviewed: The authors searched MEDLINE, Epistemonikos, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through November 25, 2025. Independent paired reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The authors assessed the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach and reported results in summary of findings tables. Results: In 1 study, the researchers evaluated the impact of vital staining, specifically toluidine blue, to screen adults without lesions. No adverse events (moderate certainty) were reported. The rate ratio for oral cancer incidence was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.24 to 1.23; low certainty) and 0.31 (95% CI, 0.03 to 2.94; very low certainty) for malignant transformation. The authors included 36 studies on diagnostic test accuracy in adults with lesions. The pooled sensitivity and specificity (2,770 lesions, 35 studies) was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.90; very low certainty) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.76; very low certainty), respectively. Conclusions and Practical Implications: The effects of vital staining in people with and without lesions in primary care settings are very uncertain due to serious risk of bias and indirectness. Among adults with lesions, the data suggest many false-positive results are expected, which are associated with downstream consequences like unnecessary biopsies and emotional burden.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)588-601
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of the American Dental Association
Volume157
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2026

Keywords

  • Oral cancer
  • diagnostic impact
  • diagnostic test accuracy
  • evidence-based dentistry
  • oral potentially malignant disorders
  • oral squamous cell carcinoma
  • vital staining

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Vital staining adjuncts to determine the need for biopsy for early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma and potentially malignant disorders: An evidence summary of a living systematic review, Version 2026 1.0'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this