Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Versorgungsnahe Daten zur Evaluation von Interventionseffekten: Teil 2 des Manuals

Translated title of the contribution: Routine Practice Data for Evaluating Intervention Effects: Part 2 of the Manual
  • Falk Hoffmann
  • , Thomas Kaiser
  • , Christian Apfelbacher
  • , Stefan Benz
  • , Thomas Bierbaum
  • , Karsten Dreinhöfer
  • , Michael Hauptmann
  • , Claus Dieter Heidecke
  • , Michael Koller
  • , Tanja Kostuj
  • , Olaf Ortmann
  • , Jochen Schmitt
  • , Holger Schünemann
  • , Christof Veit
  • , Wolfgang Hoffmann
  • , Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
  • University of Oldenburg
  • Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen
  • Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg
  • Klinikverbund Südwest GmbH
  • Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tumorzentren
  • Deutsches Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung
  • Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane
  • Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen (IQTIG)
  • University of Regensburg
  • St. Marien-Hospitals Hamm
  • Technische Universität Dresden
  • BQS Institut für Qualität & Patientensicherheit GmbH
  • University of Greifswald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

The evaluation of intervention effects is an important domain of health services research. The ad hoc commission for the use of routine practice data of the German Network for Health Services Research (DNVF) therefore provides this second part of its manual focusing on the use of routine practice data for the evaluation of intervention effects. First, we discuss definition issues and the importance of contextual factors. Subsequently, general requirements for planning, data collection and analysis as well as concrete examples for the evaluation of intervention effects for the 3 fields of application regarding pharmacotherapy, nonpharmaceutical interventions as well as complex interventions are elaborated. We consider scenarios in which no information from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the two groups directly is yet available or in which RCTs are already available but an extension of the research question is required. In all examples either with or without randomization, the first and foremost question is always whether the data source is suitable for the specific research question. Most of the examples chosen are from oncology trials, because the necessary data are already available for Germany, at least in some form. Finally, the manual discusses possible challenges for future use of these data.

Translated title of the contributionRoutine Practice Data for Evaluating Intervention Effects: Part 2 of the Manual
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)470-480
Number of pages11
JournalGesundheitswesen
Volume83
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2021

Keywords

  • evidence-based medicine
  • Health services research
  • Real world data
  • Routine pratice data

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Routine Practice Data for Evaluating Intervention Effects: Part 2 of the Manual'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this