Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validity of composite end points in clinical trials

  • Victor M. Montori
  • , Gaietà Permanyer-Miralda
  • , Ignacio Ferreira-González
  • , Jason W. Busse
  • , Valeria Pacheco-Huergo
  • , Dianne Bryant
  • , Jordi Alonso
  • , Elie A. Akl
  • , Antònia Domingo-Salvany
  • , Edward Mills
  • , Ping Wu
  • , Holger J. Schünemann
  • , Roman Jaeschke
  • , Gordon H. Guyatt
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Vall d'Hebron University Hospital
  • Autonomous University of Barcelona
  • McMaster University
  • Generalitat de Catalunya
  • Municipal Institute for Medical Research Hospital del Mar
  • SUNY Buffalo
  • Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

368 Scopus citations

Abstract

Use of composite end points as the main outcome in randomised trials can hide wide differences in the individual measures. How should you apply the results to clinical practice?

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)594-596
Number of pages3
JournalBMJ
Volume330
Issue number7491
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 12 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of composite end points in clinical trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this