Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Valid issues but limited scope: A response to Kitchen and Berk's research commentary on educational technology

  • University of Denver

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

In their Research Commentary, Kitchen and Berk (2016) argue that educational technology may focus only on skills for low-income students and students of color, further limiting their opportunities to learn mathematical reasoning, and thus pose a challenge to realizing standards-based reforms. Although we share the concern about equity and about funds wasted by inappropriate purchases of technology before planning based on research and the wisdom of expert practice, including inadequate professional development, we believe that Kitchen and Berk's commentary contains several limitations that could be misconstrued and thus misdirect policy and practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)474-482
Number of pages9
JournalJournal for Research in Mathematics Education
Volume48
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2017

Keywords

  • Educational technology
  • Equity
  • Mathematics education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Valid issues but limited scope: A response to Kitchen and Berk's research commentary on educational technology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this