Abstract
Purpose: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure within 2 years after radical prostatectomy (RP) has been shown to be a clinically significant predictor of distant failure. This study was performed to estimate 2-year PSA failure rates on the basis of readily available clinical and pathologic factors to identify patients for whom effective adjuvant systemic therapy is needed. Patients and Methods: A Cox regression multivariable analysis was used to determine whether the percentage of positive prostate biopsies, PSA level, and the pathologic findings at RP in 1,728 men provided clinically relevant information about PSA outcome after RP. A boot-strapping technique with 2,000 replications was used to provide 95% confidence intervals for the predicted 2-year PSA failure rates, which were determined on the basis of the independent clinical and pathologic predictors of PSA outcome. Results: The independent predictors of time to PSA failure included a percentage of positive prostate biopsies of greater than 34% (P ≤ .009), PSA level greater than 10 ng/mL (P ≤ .01), seminal vesicle invasion (P = .02), prostatectomy Gleason score of 8 to 10 (P = .04), and positive surgical margins (P = .0001). Predictions of 2-year PSA failure rates and bootstrap estimates of the 95% confidence intervals were arranged in a tabular format, stratified by independent clinical and pathologic predictors of PSA outcome. Conclusion: Patients who are most likely to benefit from effective adjuvant systemic therapy after RP can be identified using readily available clinical and pathologic data. (C) 2000 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3240-3246 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Journal of Clinical Oncology |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 18 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 15 2000 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Utilizing predictions of early prostate-specific antigen failure to optimize patient selection for adjuvant systemic therapy trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver