Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Using Systematic Reviews in Guideline Development: The GRADE Approach

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Systematic reviews are essential to produce trustworthy guidelines. To assess the body of evidence included in a systematic review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group has developed an approach that is used by over 100 organizations, including the World Health Organization and Cochrane. GRADE provides operational definitions and instructions to rate the certainty of the evidence for each outcome in a review as high, moderate, low, or very low for interventions, prognostic questions, values and preferences, test accuracy, and resource utilization. GRADE includes assessing risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, and publication bias, the magnitude of effects, dose-response relations, and the impact of residual confounding and bias. Assessments are presented in GRADE tables, which may be produced using the GRADEpro software tool. Guideline panels can use these tables to produce recommendations based on the GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSystematic Reviews in Health Research
Subtitle of host publicationMeta-Analysis in Context: Third Edition
Publisherwiley
Pages424-448
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)9781119099369
ISBN (Print)9781405160506
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using Systematic Reviews in Guideline Development: The GRADE Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this