Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Using machine learning to optimize antibiotic combinations: dosing strategies for meropenem and polymyxin B against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

  • N. M. Smith
  • , J. R. Lenhard
  • , K. R. Boissonneault
  • , C. B. Landersdorfer
  • , J. B. Bulitta
  • , P. N. Holden
  • , A. Forrest
  • , R. L. Nation
  • , J. Li
  • , B. T. Tsuji
  • California Northstate University
  • SUNY Buffalo
  • Monash University
  • University of Florida
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: Increased rates of carbapenem-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii have forced clinicians to rely upon last-line agents, such as the polymyxins, or empirical, unoptimized combination therapy. Therefore, the objectives of this study were: (a) to evaluate the in vitro pharmacodynamics of meropenem and polymyxin B (PMB) combinations against A. baumannii; (b) to utilize a mechanism-based mathematical model to quantify bacterial killing; and (c) to develop a genetic algorithm (GA) to define optimal dosing strategies for meropenem and PMB. Methods: A. baumannii (N16870; MICmeropenem = 16 mg/L, MICPMB = 0.5 mg/L) was studied in the hollow-fibre infection model (initial inoculum 108 cfu/mL) over 14 days against meropenem and PMB combinations. A mechanism-based model of the data and population pharmacokinetics of each drug were used to develop a GA to define the optimal regimen parameters. Results: Monotherapies resulted in regrowth to ~1010 cfu/mL by 24 h, while combination regimens employing high-intensity PMB exposure achieved complete bacterial eradication (0 cfu/mL) by 336 h. The mechanism-based model demonstrated an SC50 (PMB concentration for 50% of maximum synergy on meropenem killing) of 0.0927 mg/L for PMB-susceptible subpopulations versus 3.40 mg/L for PMB-resistant subpopulations. The GA had a preference for meropenem regimens that improved the %T > MIC via longer infusion times and shorter dosing intervals. The GA predicted that treating 90% of simulated subjects harbouring a 108 cfu/mL starting inoculum to a point of 100 cfu/mL would require a regimen of meropenem 19.6 g/day 2 h prolonged infusion (2 hPI) q5h + PMB 5.17 mg/kg/day 2 hPI q6h (where the 0 h meropenem and PMB doses should be ‘loaded’ with 80.5% and 42.2% of the daily dose, respectively). Conclusion: This study provides a methodology leveraging in vitro experimental data, a mathematical pharmacodynamic model, and population pharmacokinetics provide a possible avenue to optimize treatment regimens beyond the use of the ‘traditional’ indices of antibiotic action.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1207-1213
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Microbiology and Infection
Volume26
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2020

Keywords

  • Acinetobacter baumannii
  • Antibiotic resistance
  • Combination therapy
  • Genetic algorithm
  • Machine learning
  • Mechanism-based model
  • Meropenem
  • Pharmacodynamics
  • Pharmacometrics
  • Polymyxin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using machine learning to optimize antibiotic combinations: dosing strategies for meropenem and polymyxin B against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this