Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Using GRADE in situations of emergencies and urgencies: certainty in evidence and recommendations matters during the COVID-19 pandemic, now more than ever and no matter what

  • Holger J. Schünemann
  • , Nancy Santesso
  • , Gunn E. Vist
  • , Carlos Cuello
  • , Tamara Lotfi
  • , Signe Flottorp
  • , Marina Davoli
  • , Reem Mustafa
  • , Joerg J. Meerpohl
  • , Pablo Alonso-Coello
  • , Elie A. Akl
  • McMaster University
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health
  • Department of Epidemiology Lazio Region
  • University of Kansas
  • University of Freiburg
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédicaen Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)
  • American University of Beirut

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: The public, policy makers, and science communities are subject to many false, uninformed, overly optimistic, premature, or simply ridiculous health claims. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and its context is a paramount example for such claims. In this article, we describe why expressing the certainty in evidence to support a decision is critical and why the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach matters now, perhaps more than ever and no matter what the specific topic is in relation to COVID-19. We finally also offer suggestions for how it can be used appropriately to support decision-making at global, national, and local level when emergency, urgent or rapid responses are needed. Study Design and Setting: This is an invited commentary to address the objectives above building on examples from the recent COVID-19 pandemic. This includes an iterative discussion of examples and development of guidance. Results: The GRADE approach is a transparent and structured method for assessing the certainty of evidence and when developing recommendations that requires little additional time. We describe why emergency, urgent, or rapid responses do not justify omitting this critical assessment of the evidence. In situations of emergencies and urgencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, GRADE can similarly be used to express and convey certainty in intervention effects, test accuracy, risk and prognostic factors, consequences of public health measures, and qualitative bodies of evidence. Conclusions: Assessing and communicating the certainty of evidence during the COVID-19 pandemic is critical. Those offering evidence synthesis or making recommendations should use transparent ratings of the body of evidence supporting a claim regardless of time that is available or needed to provide this response.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)202-207
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume127
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2020

Keywords

  • GRADE
  • Guidelines
  • Pandemics
  • Recommendations
  • Systematic reviews

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using GRADE in situations of emergencies and urgencies: certainty in evidence and recommendations matters during the COVID-19 pandemic, now more than ever and no matter what'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this