Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Using a knowledge-and-appraisal model of personality architecture to understand consistency and variability in smokers' self-efficacy appraisals in high-risk situations

  • Daniel Cervone
  • , Heather Orom
  • , Daniele Artistico
  • , William G. Shadel
  • , Jon D. Kassel
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
  • City University of New York
  • RAND Corporation

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present research used idiographic methods for identifying intraindividual, cross-contextual patterns of consistency and variability in self-efficacy appraisal among smokers. Building on a knowledge-andappraisal model of personality architecture, the authors assessed (a) schematic self-knowledge, (b) beliefs about the relevance of high-risk smoking-related situations to those schematic attributes, and (c) appraisals of self-efficacy for smoking avoidance in specific contexts. The idiographic assessments of situational and self-knowledge robustly predicted patterns of intraindividual consistency and variability in self-efficacy appraisal. A response-time measure revealed that speed in making positive self-appraisals varied systematically across schema-relevant contexts. Results speak to the field's need for assessment strategies to detect, and theoretical models to explain, within-person, across-context variations in self-efficacy for avoiding addictive behaviors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-54
Number of pages11
JournalPsychology of Addictive Behaviors
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2007

Keywords

  • High risk situations
  • KAPA model
  • Personality architecture
  • Self-efficacy
  • Smokers
  • Smoking

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using a knowledge-and-appraisal model of personality architecture to understand consistency and variability in smokers' self-efficacy appraisals in high-risk situations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this