Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Understanding social network support, composition, and structure among cancer caregivers

  • Elizabeth G. Bouchard
  • , Mark A. Prince
  • , Christopher McCarty
  • , Paula C. Vincent
  • , Hital Patel
  • , Susan A. LaValley
  • , R. Lorraine Collins
  • , Olle Jane Z. Sahler
  • , Till Krenz
  • , Kara M. Kelly
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  • Colorado State University
  • University of Florida
  • University of Rochester
  • University of Miami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: We examined the social network support, composition, and structure of pediatric cancer caregivers. Methods: We used a self-report survey to collect egocentric social network data from 107 caregivers of pediatric cancer patients and calculated descriptive statistics to examine cancer-related support network composition, function, and structure. We then ran logistic regressions to examine the relationships between network characteristics and overall satisfaction with social support. Results: Family members were the most common source of emotional support and logistical support, and health care providers were the most common source of informational support. Participants perceived the “most helpful” forms of support as being: (1) emotional support from family and health care providers; (2) informational support from health care providers and other cancer caregivers; and (3) logistical support from family. Overall, caregivers wished that 9.8% of their network ties had provided more support, with family members being the most common alter type to disappoint caregivers and offer less support than needed/expected. Caregivers who reported higher network disappointment (having network members who offered less support than needed/expected) were significantly less satisfied with emotional support than those with lower network disappointment (Odds Ratio = 0.18, p = 0.02), and caregivers with higher network disappointment were significantly less satisfied with logistical support compared to those with lower network disappointment (Odds Ratio = 0.14, p = 0.01). Conclusion: Our results show differences in the nature of social support provided by different types of network members. These findings have implications for tailoring social network interventions to improve caregiver and family outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)408-417
Number of pages10
JournalPsycho-Oncology
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023

Keywords

  • cancer
  • caregiving
  • oncology
  • social network
  • social support

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding social network support, composition, and structure among cancer caregivers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this