Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Understanding and applying principles of social cognition and decision making in adaptive environmental governance

  • University of Louisville
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

68 Scopus citations

Abstract

Environmental governance systems are under greater pressure to adapt and to cope with increased social and ecological uncertainty from stressors like climate change. We review principles of social cognition and decision making that shape and constrain how environmental governance systems adapt. We focus primarily on the interplay between key decision makers in society and legal systems. We argue that adaptive governance must overcome three cooperative dilemmas to facilitate adaptation: (1) encouraging collaborative problem solving, (2) garnering social acceptance and commitment, and (3) cultivating a culture of trust and tolerance for change and uncertainty. However, to do so governance systems must cope with biases in people’s decision making that cloud their judgment and create conflict. These systems must also satisfy people’s fundamental needs for self-determination, fairness, and security, ensuring that changes to environmental governance are perceived as legitimate, trustworthy, and acceptable. We discuss the implications of these principles for common governance solutions (e.g., public participation, enforcement) and conclude with methodological recommendations. We outline how scholars can investigate the social cognitive principles involved in cases of adaptive governance.

Original languageEnglish
Article number33
JournalConservation Ecology
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Adaptive governance
  • Cognition
  • Cooperation
  • Environmental law
  • Legitimacy
  • Social decision making

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding and applying principles of social cognition and decision making in adaptive environmental governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this