Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Troubling gender norms and the ideal worker in academic life

  • George Mason University

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

We are suggesting that the power structure and hierarchy that are foundational to the notion of the ideal worker is more complicated for faculty who also have the ability to access forms of power. Faculty, at least full-time, tenure-line faculty, are not simply under immediate threat of dismissal and other forms of hierarchical power found in other more corporate-like organizations. And, faculty do often create the very processes of evaluation in tenure and promotion which gives them the agency to “run things themselves.” The lack of an immediate threat to job security and the agency to create the systems of evaluation initially appear to stand in contrast to the ideal worker where strict structural hierarchy and false notions of choice frame a discriminatory environment for women. In fact, evidence of some of these efforts is found in research on faculty.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCritical Approaches to Women and Gender in Higher Education
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages115-138
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9781137592859
ISBN (Print)9781137592842
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Keywords

  • Ideal worker
  • Work/life balance
  • Workload

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Troubling gender norms and the ideal worker in academic life'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this