Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Translating ctDNA into cutaneous melanoma care: An international expert survey

  • L.ZimmerLisafor the Melanoma World Society Study Group
  • University of Hamburg
  • Centre Georges-François Leclerc
  • University of Naples Federico II
  • IRCCS Istituto nazionale tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale - Napoli
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Zurich
  • Utrecht University
  • Technical University of Munich
  • Peking University
  • Heidelberg University 
  • University of Groningen
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Military Medical Academy
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Université Paris Cité
  • The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
  • The University of Sydney
  • University of Manchester
  • University of Barcelona
  • AvMonforte de Lemos
  • Elbe-Kliniken Buxtehude
  • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
  • Macquarie University
  • Institut Gustave Roussy
  • University of Duisburg-Essen
  • Moffitt Cancer Center
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais
  • University of South Florida
  • Universitätsklinikum Kiel
  • Maastricht University
  • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
  • Rabin Medical Center Israel
  • German Cancer Research Center
  • University of Washington
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • Leiden University
  • University of Regensburg
  • IRCCS Istituto Europeo di Oncologia - Milano
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • University Health Network
  • Northwell Health System

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker in melanoma, with higher sensitivity for tumor burden detection than conventional diagnostics. While well established in research, clinical routine implementation remains pending. Key global questions concern optimal clinical applications and barriers to adoption. Methods A web-based survey of 116 members of the Melanoma World Society Study Group assessed international expert opinions on ctDNA utility across predefined clinical scenarios. The questionnaire included 18 general questions on ctDNA use and 5 clinical vignettes with de-identified patient data and retrospectively obtained ctDNA results. Results ctDNA was rated most valuable for detecting minimal residual disease (mean score 3.63), surveillance of recurrent disease (3.85), and stage IV melanoma (3.82), with limited utility in early stages. Experts considered ctDNA superior to S100 and LDH for early relapse detection and identifying progressive disease. Most participants (80%) agreed that ctDNA correlates with radiographic response, and 82% favored its integration into routine follow-ups. In urgent high-tumor-burden settings, 82.8% would initiate BRAFi/MEKi therapy based on ctDNA if tissue analysis was pending, and 93.9% if unavailable. For central nervous system lesions, 62% did not support blood ctDNA, while 66% considered cerebrospinal fluid valuable. Pragmatic approaches with small to mid-size targeted panels and short turnaround times were preferred. Major barriers included the need for prospective trials (85%), standardized guidelines (83%), and reimbursement policies (82%). Conclusion Key opinion leaders regarded ctDNA as a valuable adjunct selected melanoma scenarios. Validation through prospective studies, guideline development, and reimbursement frameworks are essential for broader clinical implementation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number116676
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume239
DOIs
StatePublished - May 15 2026

Keywords

  • Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)
  • Expert survey
  • Liquid biopsy
  • Melanoma
  • Minimal residual disease (MRD)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Translating ctDNA into cutaneous melanoma care: An international expert survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this