Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Tracheal Intubation by Advanced Practice Registered Nurses in Pediatric Critical Care: Retrospective Study from the National Emergency Airway for Children Registry (2015-2019)∗

  • Danielle M. Van Damme
  • , Emily M. McRae
  • , Sharon Y. Irving
  • , Serena P. Kelly
  • , Keiko M. Tarquinio
  • , John S. Giuliano
  • , Michael D. Ruppe
  • , Krista L. Kierys
  • , Ryan K. Breuer
  • , Simon J. Parsons
  • , Palen P. Mallory
  • , Asha N. Shenoi
  • , Kelly A. Swain
  • , Lee A. Polikoff
  • , Anthony Lee
  • , Michelle A. Adu-Darko
  • , Natalie Napolitano
  • , Justine Shults
  • , Akira Nishisaki
  • , John W. Berkenbosch
  • Norton Children's Hospital
  • University of Louisville
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  • Oregon Health and Science University
  • Emory University
  • Yale University
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Alberta Children's Hospital
  • Duke University
  • University of Kentucky
  • Brown University
  • Nationwide Children’s Hospital
  • University of Virginia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe tracheal intubation (TI) practice by Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) in North American PICUs, including rates of TI-associated events (TIAEs) from 2015 to 2019. DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective study using the National Emergency Airway Registry for Children with all TIs performed in PICU and pediatric cardiac ICU between January 2015 and December 2019. The primary outcome was first attempt TI success rate. Secondary outcomes were TIAEs, severe TIAEs, and hypoxemia. SUBJECTS: Critically ill children requiring TI in a PICU or pediatric cardiac ICU. INTERVENTIONS: None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 11,012 TIs, APRNs performed 1,626 (14.7%). Overall, TI by APRNs, compared with other clinicians, occurred less frequently in patients with known difficult airway (11.1% vs. 14.3%; p < 0.001), but more frequently in infants younger than 1 year old (55.9% vs. 44.4%; p < 0.0001), and in patients with cardiac disease (26.3% vs. 15.9%; p < 0.0001).There was lower odds of success in first attempt TI for APRNs vs. other clinicians (adjusted odds ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.79). We failed to identify a difference in rates of TIAE, severe TIAE, and oxygen desaturation events for TIs by APRNs compared with other clinicians. The TI first attempt success rate improved with APRN experience (< 1 yr: 54.2%, 1-5 yr: 59.4%, 6-10 yr: 67.6%, > 10 yr: 63.1%; p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: TI performed by APRNs was associated with lower odds of first attempt success when compared with other ICU clinicians although there was no appreciable difference in procedural adverse events. There appears to be a positive relationship between experience and success rates. These data suggest there is an ongoing need for opportunities to build on TI competency with APRNs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)139-146
Number of pages8
JournalPediatric Critical Care Medicine
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2024

Keywords

  • advance practice registered nurse
  • adverse event
  • endotracheal intubation
  • pediatric intensive care unit
  • safety

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tracheal Intubation by Advanced Practice Registered Nurses in Pediatric Critical Care: Retrospective Study from the National Emergency Airway for Children Registry (2015-2019)∗'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this