Abstract
Indigenous scholars have much to teach political scientists about recognizing and addressing the ways in which power, politics, and colonialism irrevocably shape the data-generating process. In this article, we present a methodological framework for a decolonial quantitative political science, outlining how it was operationalized in the design and execution of the 2019 Native Hawaiian Survey. We demonstrate the utility of this methodological framework through a descriptive analysis of Native Hawaiian respondents' self-identification. Aligned with the theoretical insights of kanaka (Native Hawaiian) scholars, we provide empirical support for the intertwined political relationship between Native Hawaiian identity and national identity-a finding that demands further empirical study among all Indigenous populations. This article offers two main contributions. First, it provides a methodological framework to guide quantitative political science research on Indigenous populations. Second, it adds empirically to the growing literature on Indigenous self-identification.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 90-118 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 29 2022 |
Keywords
- Decolonial
- Indigenous
- methodology
- Native Hawaiian
- self-identification
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Toward a decolonial quantitative political science: Indigenous self-identification in the 2019 Native Hawaiian Survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver