Abstract
Background and Context: We report on four years of a design-based research project with all grade-eight students in two urban-ring schools of the Northeast US. Youth built automated tabletop “smart” greenhouses. Objective: We addressed the research questions, (1) In what ways did four iterations of the smart-greenhouse project support students’ inflections of interest in STEM+C? and (2) How, if at all, did rightful presence foster development of interest? Method: This mixed-methods study for convergence includes paired-sample t-tests of means for surveys (N = 599) and descriptive, in vivo, and inductive team-coding for interviews (25 focal students). Findings: We found evidence to extend Hidi and Renninger’s four-phase model of interest development, with a phase we call “budding individual interest”, including five tensions thereof. Implications: We share educational design considerations related to curriculum, instruction, and follow-up activities, and we explore the potential role of regular access, personal significance, and contextual expectations in students.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 726-753 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Computer Science Education |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2025 |
Keywords
- Interest
- design-based research
- interdisciplinary learning
- middle-school education
- project-based learning
- rightful presence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Toward a “budding” individual interest: evidence for a fifth phase of development in four years of an automated greenhouse project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver