Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

To Treat or Not to Treat: A Scoping Review of Speech Treatment for Dysarthria in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

  • Brooke Mai Whelan
  • , Danielle Aldridge
  • , Jessica Ruhle
  • , Persephone Whitelock
  • , Shana Taubert
  • , Annette Collins
  • , Elaine Kearney
  • , Salma Charania
  • , Robert D. Henderson
  • , Sarah J. Wallace
  • , Claire Mitchell
  • , Kaila L. Stipancic
  • , Mili Kuruvilla-Dugdale
  • , Adam P. Vogel
  • University of Queensland
  • Post Office Royal Brisbane Hospital
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital
  • Central Queensland University
  • University of Manchester
  • University of Iowa
  • University of Melbourne

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Speech loss is recognised as one of the most devastating outcomes for individuals with ALS, yet active speech intervention is rarely targeted in this population. Clinicians face significant challenges in managing dysarthria associated with ALS due to the rapidly progressive nature of the disease, historical concerns around intensive exercise accelerating decline, and an absence of direction on restorative and compensatory intervention strategies in current clinical care guidelines. This review evaluates the scope and quality of evidence for speech treatments in ALS to identify knowledge gaps and establish research priorities to guide clinical care. Methods: Studies were retrieved from six electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and PsycINFO). Results: Four studies met inclusion criteria. Treatment approaches included: music-based speech therapy; multisubsystem speech rehabilitation program, tongue strengthening and articulation training; and Lee Silverman Voice Treatment-LOUD® combined with additional voice and articulation therapy. Sample sizes were small, with all studies demonstrating notable methodological weaknesses. The limited evidence base, marked by conflicting results and methodological flaws, prevents any reliable conclusions about treatment effectiveness. Conclusions: Despite the prevalence and impact of dysarthria in this population, evidence for speech treatment remains sparse, of generally low quality, and provides limited guidance for clinical practice. The changing perspective on exercise in ALS warrants rigorous investigation of tailored dysarthria interventions for this population that are minimally fatiguing and enhance speech by making use of residual physiologic support.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2434
JournalHealthcare (Switzerland)
Volume13
Issue number19
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2025

Keywords

  • amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
  • dysarthria
  • motor neurone disease
  • speech
  • treatment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'To Treat or Not to Treat: A Scoping Review of Speech Treatment for Dysarthria in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this