Abstract
What influences the duration of interstate militarized conflicts? I argue that duration is affected by when the militarization occurs in the overarching dispute. Further, I suggest that the type of dispute being fought over has a conditioning effect. I hypothesize that later-occurring militarizations will last longer, but only in disputes over territorial issues. I test my argument on a sample of militarized conflicts over territorial, maritime, and river disputes, using a dynamic methodological technique to account for states’ strategic calculations. I find empirical support for my theoretical claims, contributing to our understanding of the interplay between interstate disputes and militarization.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 308-329 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Conflict Management and Peace Science |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 1 2017 |
Keywords
- Conflict duration
- disputed issue
- interdependent durations
- issue salience
- militarized interstate dispute
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Time is on my side? The impact of timing and dispute type on militarized conflict duration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver