Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The utility of non-proportional quota sampling for recruiting at-risk women for microbicide research

  • Kathleen M. Morrow
  • , Sara Vargas
  • , Rochelle K. Rosen
  • , Anna L. Christensen
  • , Liz Salomon
  • , Lawrence Shulman
  • , Candelaria Barroso
  • , Joseph L. Fava
  • Lifespan
  • Fenway Community Health Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the context of a measurement development study designed to contextualize microbicide acceptability, a sample that represented a range of at-risk women and maintained the statistical power needed for validity analyses was required. A non-proportional quota sampling strategy focused on race/ethnicity and number of sexual partners was utilized. This strategy resulted in enrollment of approximately equal proportions of Latina (31%), Black (36%), and White (32%) women, and an approximately 1:2 ratio of single-partnered (29%) and multi-partnered (71%) women. About 17% of women screened were ineligible based on eligibility criteria; an additional 16% were ineligible based on quota closures. Most participants were recruited through word of mouth (39%), community-based organizations (19%), or media sources (19%). Women recruited through word of mouth had the highest screen-to-interview completion percentage (67%). Non-proportional quota sampling is a feasible option for ensuring adequate representation of sample characteristics in microbicide research, but this goal should be weighed against cost and staff burden.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)586-595
Number of pages10
JournalAIDS and Behavior
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007

Keywords

  • HIV/STD Research
  • Microbicide
  • Non-proportional Quota Sampling
  • Recruitment
  • Women

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The utility of non-proportional quota sampling for recruiting at-risk women for microbicide research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this