Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The university, democracy, and the challenge to meritocracy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Universities can undergird democracy in two ways. First, they can promote and defend truth, which is antithetical to despotism and a natural progenitor of democracy, but they do so only as the university itself is meritocratic and courageous in its adherence to canons of intellectual rigour and academic integrity. Second, universities are, or can be, engines of opportunity and of the ascendence of achievement over ascription-and thus of democratization. However, absent efforts to the contrary, the natural tendency of universities is to perpetuate or even to widen the effects of ascription: for example, social class, race, or gender. A truly democratic university, then, must find ways to select among students and to distribute its benefits in ways that are still meritocratic, but that weaken rather than accelerate the transmission of the status and wealth into which one is born.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-23
Number of pages5
JournalInterchange
Volume23
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1992

Keywords

  • academic freedom
  • achievement (versus ascription)
  • ascription
  • democracy
  • equal opportunity
  • meritocracy
  • socio-economic status
  • tenure
  • truth

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The university, democracy, and the challenge to meritocracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this