Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The speedy trial right and national security detentions: Critical comments on United States v. Ghailani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article reviews the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to uphold the conviction and sentence of Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, the sole Guantá namo detainee to have been transferred to the United States for trial. Ghailani was captured nearly five years before his arraignment and argued that his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated by the delay. The article contends that, in rejecting Ghailani's argument, the Second Circuit distorted the doctrinal framework governing speedy trial claims and mischaracterized the interests that the speedy trial right is intended to protect. The article also explores the implications of the Second Circuit's decision for cases in which the government asserts a national security interest in postponing a defendant's prosecution while continuing to hold the defendant in custody.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)871-885
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of International Criminal Justice
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The speedy trial right and national security detentions: Critical comments on United States v. Ghailani'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this