Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The process of intimacy: Similarity, understanding and gender

  • PENN Council for Relationships

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

48 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study examined gender and three aspects of marital intimacy using a method to establish both objective and subjective indices of intimacy. Fifty couples answered the Personal Assessment of Intimate Relationships (Schaefer & Olson, 1981) twice: once as a self-report and once to respond as they predicted their spouses would answer. Couples who were less accurate in predicting each other's responses also diverged in their experience of intimacy and reported lower intimacy. Results suggest that high intimacy is based on both understanding and similarity of intimate experience. Women reported significantly higher levels of intimacy and were also better than men in predicting their partners' feelings. These findings suggest that women may be more attuned to intimacy or that definitions and assessment of intimacy are gender biased or both.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)273-288
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Marital and Family Therapy
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1998

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The process of intimacy: Similarity, understanding and gender'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this