Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Persuasive Impact of Narrative Richness in Antibiotic Stewardship Communication: The Roles of Emotions, Psychological Distance, and Self-Referencing

  • Yanmengqian Zhou
  • , Madeline M. Jupina
  • , Erina L. Farrell
  • , Shulun Wang
  • , Bryan J. Mesquita
  • Pennsylvania State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study examines how narrative richness—defined as detail and elaboration in characters, plot, and context—shapes persuasive outcomes in antibiotic stewardship messaging. In a single-factor experiment (N = 1,264), compared to lean narratives or statistics, rich narratives most effectively elicited fear through heightened transportation, although they did not outperform lean narratives in evoking guilt. Fear increased risk perception through reduced psychological distance and greater self-referencing; guilt was positively associated with both. Elevated risk perception predicted more favorable attitudes and stronger behavioral intentions. These findings offer theoretical and practical implications for science communication strategies to promote antibiotic stewardship and other health behaviors.

Original languageEnglish
Article number10755470251385494
JournalScience Communication
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Keywords

  • discrete emotions
  • narrative persuasion
  • psychological distance
  • risk perception
  • self-referencing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Persuasive Impact of Narrative Richness in Antibiotic Stewardship Communication: The Roles of Emotions, Psychological Distance, and Self-Referencing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this