Abstract
In this article, we examine the relation between return volatility, average trade size, and the frequency of transactions using transaction data. Consistent with Jones, Kaul, and Lipson (1994. Review of Financial Studies, 7, 631-651), our results show that the frequency of trades has a high explanatory power for return volatility. However, contrary to their finding, we find that average trade size contains nontrivial information for return volatility. The positive relation between return volatility and average trade size is more significant for actively traded stocks. Furthermore, return volatility exhibits significant intraday variations. It is found that the effect of trade frequency on return volatility is much stronger in the opening trading period.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 375-397 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | International Review of Economics and Finance |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 1999 |
Keywords
- Frequency
- Information asymmetry
- Trade size
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The intraday relation between return volatility, transactions, and volume *'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver