Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Importance of Altruistic Versus Egoistic Motivations: A Content Analysis of Conflicted Motivations in Children’s Television Programming

  • Lindsay Hahn
  • , Ron Tamborini
  • , Sujay Prabhu
  • , Brian Klebig
  • , Clare Grall
  • , Di Pei
  • Michigan State University
  • George Mason University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

A content analysis examined the frequency with which altruistic versus egoistic motivations were acted upon in television content where these motivations were in conflict with each other. The sample was drawn from children’s television programs popular among different age groups (ages 2–5, 6–11, and 12–17 years). It also examined whether the motivations acted upon were performed by affable (likable, heroic) or surly (unlikable, villainous) characters and whether they were rewarded or punished. Extending previous research (Lewis & Mitchell, 2014), we found that portrayal patterns stressed the importance of altruistic motivations (particularly the care motivation) for content popular among the youngest age group and egoistic motivations (particularly the growth-related motivations of competence, autonomy, and relatedness) for content popular among older children. Findings are interpreted in terms of the model of intuitive morality and exemplars (Tamborini, 2011, 2013), which suggests media representations can influence audience motivations. Implications for scholars, parents, and content producers are explored.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-79
Number of pages13
JournalCommunication Reports
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2017

Keywords

  • Age Differences
  • Children and Media
  • Children’s Television
  • Media Influence
  • Motivation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Importance of Altruistic Versus Egoistic Motivations: A Content Analysis of Conflicted Motivations in Children’s Television Programming'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this