Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Impact of Preprocedural Platelet Function Testing on Periprocedural Complication Rates Associated With Pipeline Flow Diversion: An International Multicenter Study

  • Justin E. Vranic
  • , Adam A. Dmytriw
  • , Inka K. Berglar
  • , Naif M. Alotaibi
  • , Nicole M. Cancelliere
  • , Christopher J. Stapleton
  • , James D. Rabinov
  • , Pablo Harker
  • , Rajiv Gupta
  • , Joshua D. Bernstock
  • , Matthew J. Koch
  • , Scott B. Raymond
  • , Justin R. Mascitelli
  • , T. Tyler Patterson
  • , Joshua Seinfeld
  • , Andrew White
  • , David Case
  • , Christopher Roark
  • , Chirag D. Gandhi
  • , Fawaz Al-Mufti
  • Jared Cooper, Charles Matouk, Nanthiya Sujijantarat, Diego A. Devia, Maria I. Ocampo-Navia, Daniel E. Villamizar-Torres, Juan C. Puentes, Mohamed M. Salem, Ammad Baig, Kareem El Namaani, Anna Luisa Kühn, Bryan Pukenas, Brian T. Jankowitz, Jan Karl Burkhardt, Adnan Siddiqui, Pascal Jabbour, Jasmeet Singh, Ajit S. Puri, Robert W. Regenhardt, Vitor Mendes Pereira, Aman B. Patel
  • Harvard University
  • University of Toronto
  • King Fahad Medical City
  • University of Cincinnati
  • University of Florida
  • University of Vermont Medical Center
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
  • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
  • Westchester Medical Center
  • Yale University
  • Hospital Universitario San Ignacio
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • SUNY Buffalo
  • Thomas Jefferson University
  • University of Massachusetts Medical School

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is necessary to minimize the risk of periprocedural thromboembolic complications associated with aneurysm embolization using pipeline embolization device (PED). We aimed to assess the impact of platelet function testing (PFT) on reducing periprocedural thromboembolic complications associated with PED flow diversion in patients receiving aspirin and clopidogrel. METHODS: Patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms requiring PED flow diversion were identified from 13 centers for retrospective evaluation. Clinical variables including the results of PFT before treatment, periprocedural DAPT regimen, and intracranial complications occurring within 72 h of embolization were identified. Complication rates were compared between PFT and non-PFT groups. Differences between groups were tested for statistical significance using the Wilcoxon rank sum, Fisher exact, or χ2 tests. A P-value <.05 was statistically significant. RESULTS: 580 patients underwent PED embolization with 262 patients dichotomized to the PFT group and 318 patients to the non-PFT group. 13.7% of PFT group patients were clopidogrel nonresponders requiring changes in their pre-embolization DAPT regimen. Five percentage of PFT group [2.8%, 8.5%] patients experienced thromboembolic complications vs 1.6% of patients in the non-PFT group [0.6%, 3.8%] (P = .019). Two (15.4%) PFT group patients with thromboembolic complications experienced permanent neurological disability vs 4 (80%) non-PFT group patients. 3.7% of PFT group patients [1.5%, 8.2%] and 3.5% [1.8%, 6.3%] of non-PFT group patients experienced hemorrhagic intracranial complications (P > .9). CONCLUSION: Preprocedural PFT before PED treatment of intracranial aneurysms in patients premedicated with an aspirin and clopidogrel DAPT regimen may not be necessary to significantly reduce the risk of procedure-related intracranial complications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-185
Number of pages7
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume95
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2024

Keywords

  • Aneurysm
  • Antiplatelet therapy
  • Endovascular
  • Flow diversion
  • Platelet function testing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Impact of Preprocedural Platelet Function Testing on Periprocedural Complication Rates Associated With Pipeline Flow Diversion: An International Multicenter Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this