Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The great debate at "melanoma Bridge 2018", Naples, December 1st, 2018

  • Paolo A. Ascierto
  • , Paolo Bruzzi
  • , Alexander Eggermont
  • , Omid Hamid
  • , Hussein A. Tawbi
  • , Alexander Van Akkooi
  • , Alessandro Testori
  • , Corrado Caracò
  • , Igor Puzanov
  • , Francesco Perrone
  • IRCCS Istituto nazionale tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale - Napoli
  • Ospedale Policlino San Martino -University of Genoa
  • Institut Gustave Roussy
  • The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
  • European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Data Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The great debate session at the 2018 Melanoma Bridge congress (November 29-December 1, Naples, Italy) featured counterpoint views from experts on three topical issues in melanoma. These were whether overall survival should still be the main endpoint for clinical trials in melanoma, whether anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen (CTLA)-4 is still the optimal choice of drug to use in combination with an anti-programmed death (PD)/PD-ligand (L)-1 agent, and the place of adjuvant versus neoadjuvant therapy in patients with melanoma. These three important debates are summarised in this report.

Original languageEnglish
Article number148
JournalJournal of Translational Medicine
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 10 2019

Keywords

  • Adjuvant
  • Anti-CTLA-4
  • Anti-PD-1
  • BRAF inhibitor
  • Immunotherapy
  • MEK inhibitor
  • Melanoma
  • Neoadjuvant
  • Targeted therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The great debate at "melanoma Bridge 2018", Naples, December 1st, 2018'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this