Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The fraud of John Locke: subnational challenges to democratic theory

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter questions the fundamental assumptions of liberalism as the foundation of the democratic state. It accepts the superiority of the central tenets of the liberal project over other traditions in organizing a humane state, but points to its normative limitations. It argues that sub-nationalism - the primordial call of identity - often overwhelms the primacy of individualism. Groups that coalesce under the recessive genes of religion, ethnicity, race, language, and other discriminatory markers, are easier to mobilize against the higher and nobler principles of democracy. In most democracies, voters tend to assert these identity biases over the greater public good, or even their own best interests. The most serious threat to democracy therefore is neither class nor economic station, although these are without doubt extremely relevant. It is sub-nationalism, or even nationalism, that poses the greatest peril to John Locke's concepts of freedom, individualism, and the liberal state.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationComparative Election Law
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Pages90-114
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)9781788119023
ISBN (Print)9781788119016
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The fraud of John Locke: subnational challenges to democratic theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this