Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The evaluation of ontologies toward improved semantic interoperability

  • MITRE Corporation
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

141 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recent years have seen rapid progress in the development of ontologies as semantic models intended to capture and represent aspects of the real world. There is, however, great variation in the quality of ontologies. If ontologies are to become progressively better in the future, more rigorously developed, and more appropriately compared, then a systematic discipline of ontology evaluation must be created to ensure quality of content and methodology. Systematic methods for ontology evaluation will take into account representation of individual ontologies, performance (in terms of accuracy, domain coverage and the efficiency and quality of automated reasoning using the ontologies) on tasks for which the ontology is designed and used, degree of alignment with other ontologies and their compatibility with automated reasoning. A sound and systematic approach to ontology evaluation is required to transform ontology engineering into a true scientific and engineering discipline. This chapter discusses issues and problems in ontology evaluation, describes some current strategies, and suggests some approaches that might be useful in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSemantic Web
Subtitle of host publicationRevolutionizing Knowledge Discovery in the Life Sciences
PublisherSpringer US
Pages139-158
Number of pages20
Volume9780387484389
ISBN (Electronic)9780387484389
ISBN (Print)0387484361, 9780387484365
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007

Keywords

  • alignment
  • certification
  • evaluation
  • ontology
  • semantic interoperability
  • semantic similarity
  • validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The evaluation of ontologies toward improved semantic interoperability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this