Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The effectiveness of St. John's wort in major depressive disorder: A naturalistic phase 2 follow-up in which nonresponders were provided alternate medication

  • Alan J. Gelenberg
  • , Richard C. Shelton
  • , Paul Crits-Christoph
  • , Martin B. Keller
  • , David L. Dunner
  • , Robert M.A. Hirschfeld
  • , Michael E. Thase
  • , James M. Russell
  • , R. Bruce Lydiard
  • , Robert J. Gallop
  • , Linda Todd
  • , David J. Hellerstein
  • , Paul J. Goodnick
  • , Gabor I. Keitner
  • , Stephen M. Stahl
  • , Uriel Halbreich
  • , Heather S. Hopkins
  • University of Arizona
  • Vanderbilt University
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Brown University
  • University of Washington
  • University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Southeast Health Consultants, LLC
  • West Chester University
  • Columbia University
  • University of Miami
  • University of California at San Diego

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: A continuation study of an extract of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) for depression was performed in follow-up to an acute study that found no significant difference between St. John's wort extract and placebo. Method: Seventeen subjects with DSM-IV-defined major depressive disorder who responded to St. John's wort extract in the acute-phase study (phase 1) were continued on double-blind treatment with the same preparation for 24 weeks. Ninety-five subjects who did not respond to either St. John's wort or placebo were treated with an antidepressant for 24 weeks. Results: During antidepressant treatment, mean scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression for phase 1 nonresponders decreased significantly (p < .0001), with no significant difference between St. John's wort nonresponders and placebo nonresponders. Of the 17 subjects continued on treatment with St. John's wort extract, 5 (29.4%) relapsed. Conclusions: The subjects who did not respond to St. John's wort extract or placebo in phase 1 were, by and large, not resistant to antidepressant treatment. This suggests that the lack of efficacy found by Shelton et al. in the acutephase study was unlikely to be the result of a high proportion of treatment-resistant subjects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1114-1119
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Psychiatry
Volume65
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effectiveness of St. John's wort in major depressive disorder: A naturalistic phase 2 follow-up in which nonresponders were provided alternate medication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this