Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. II. Frequency specificity

  • University of Wisconsin-Madison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

A series of experiments evaluated the effects of broadband noise (ipsilateral) on wave V of the brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER) elicited by tone bursts or clicks in the presence of high-pass masking noise. Experiment 1 used 1000- and 4000-Hz, 60-dB nHL tone bursts in the presence of broadband noise. With increasing noise level, wave V latency shift was greater for the 1000-Hz tone bursts, while amplitude decrements were similar for both tone-burst frequencies. Experiment 2 varied high-pass masker cutoff frequency and the level of subtotal masking in the presence of 50-dB nHL clicks. The effects of subtotal masking on wave V (increase in latency and decrease in amplitude) increased with increasing derived-band frequency. Experiment 3 covaried high-pass masker cutoff frequency and subtotal masking level for 1000- and 4000-Hz tone-burst stimuli. The effect of subtotal masking on wave V latency was reduced for both tone-burst frequencies when the response-generating region of the cochlear partition was limited by high-pass maskers. The results of these three experiments suggest that most of the wave V latency shift associated with increasing levels of broadband noise is mediated by a place mechanism when the stimulus is a moderate intensity (60 dB nHL), low-frequency (1000 Hz) tone burst. However, the interpretation of the latency shifts produced by broadband noise for 4000-Hz tone-burst stimuli is made more complex by multiple technical factors discussed herein.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1214-1223
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume74
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1983

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. II. Frequency specificity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this