Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The dynamics of relationship promotion: Controlling the automatic inclination to trust

  • Sandra L. Murray
  • , Sarah Gomillion
  • , John G. Holmes
  • , Brianna Harris
  • , Veronica Lamarche
  • SUNY Buffalo
  • University of Waterloo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

A dynamic model of how trust regulates relationship promotion is proposed. The model assumes that trust has both impulsive (i.e., automatic attitude toward the partner) and reflective (i.e., beliefs about the partner's caring) forms. Because overriding evaluative impulses requires self-regulatory resources, the model further posits that self-regulatory capacity controls whether people strengthen relationship connections in the face of threats to reflective trust. Two experiments and 1 longitudinal daily diary study utilizing convergent manipulations and measures of self-regulatory capacity supported the model. Results revealed that acute uncertainty about a partner's caring increased relationship-promotive sentiment and behavior when (a) people lacked self-regulatory resources to question impulsively trusting sentiments and (b) when people had self-regulatory resources available to override impulsively distrusting sentiments. In contrast, acute uncertainty about a partner's caring decreased relationship-promotive sentiment and behavior when (a) people lacked the selfregulatory capacity to question impulsively distrusting sentiments and (b) when people had the self-regulatory capacity available to override impulsively trusting sentiments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)305-334
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume104
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Keywords

  • Dual process
  • Interdependence
  • Relationship-promotion
  • Risk-regulation
  • Trust

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The dynamics of relationship promotion: Controlling the automatic inclination to trust'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this