Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) statement applied to allergen-specific immunotherapy with inhalant allergens: A global allergy and asthma European network (GA2LEN) article

  • Philippe J. Bousquet
  • , Moisés A. Calderón
  • , Pascal Demoly
  • , Désirée Larenas
  • , Giovanni Passalacqua
  • , Claus Bachert
  • , Jan Brozek
  • , G. Walter Canonica
  • , Thomas Casale
  • , Joao Fonseca
  • , Ronald Dahl
  • , Stephen R. Durham
  • , Hans Merk
  • , Margitta Worm
  • , Ulrich Wahn
  • , Torsten Zuberbier
  • , Holger J. Schünemann
  • , Jean Bousquet
  • CHU Montpellier
  • Imperial College London
  • Hospital Médica Sur
  • University of Genoa
  • Ghent University
  • McMaster University
  • Creighton University
  • University of Porto
  • Aarhus University
  • RWTH Aachen University
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • University Paris-Sud

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

52 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Randomized trials provide evidence to inform treatment decisions. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement is a set of recommendations for the reporting of trials. Objective: We sought to assess the quality of reporting allergen-specific immunotherapy trials according to CONSORT criteria. Methods: The reporting of the procedure, randomization, dropouts, strict conduct of intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, and sample size calculation according to CONSORT were assessed in the 46 subcutaneous and 48 sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) blind, placebo-controlled randomized trials published between 1996 and 2009 in English. Results: One subcutaneous immunotherapy (2.2%) and 3 SLIT (6.6%) trials met CONSORT Statement criteria. These were used for the registration of sublingual tablets to the European Medicines Agency. In subcutaneous immunotherapy, 16 (35%) studies reported a CONSORT flow chart, and 12 (26%) provided a description of dropouts. Adequate randomization was reported in 9 (35%) studies, and incomplete randomization was reported in 15 (33%). Power analysis was reported in 15 (33%) studies. In SLIT, 20 (42%) studies reported a CONSORT flow chart, and 16 (32%) a description of dropouts. ITT analysis was carried out in 1 (2.2%) SLIT study, and a modified ITT analysis was used in 1 (2.2%) subcutaneous immunotherapy study and 2 (4.4%) SLIT studies. Adequate randomization was reported in 6 (12%) studies, and incomplete randomization was reported in 16 (32%). Power analysis was reported in 15 (27%) studies. Conclusion: As in other areas of medicine, the quality of reporting of most immunotherapy trials is low, and only 4.2% of SLIT randomized controlled trials met all of the criteria of the CONSORT Statement. Use of the CONSORT criteria should be encouraged.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-56.e11
JournalJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume127
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Keywords

  • allergen
  • CONSORT
  • randomized clinical trial
  • subcutaneous immunotherapy
  • sublingual immunotherapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) statement applied to allergen-specific immunotherapy with inhalant allergens: A global allergy and asthma European network (GA2LEN) article'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this