Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The antibody response to primary and secondary infection with respiratory syncytial virus: Kinetics of class-specific responses

  • SUNY Buffalo
  • Women and Children's Hospital of Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

112 Scopus citations

Abstract

Serum antibody responses to primary and secondary infections with respiratory syncytial virus were determined in 67 hospitalized infants. Responses in IgG, IgM, and IgA immunoglobulin fractions were assayed using an indirect immunofluorescent technique. Infection was confirmed by identification of RSV antigen in nasopharyngeal secretions using indirect immunofluorescence, and by recovery of the virus in tissue culture. IgM specific antibody response was commonly observed within a few days of onset of primary infection and persisted from two to ten weeks. Increases in titer of virus-specific IgG and IgA were observed ten days after the onset of illness, and peak titers were attained three to four weeks after onset of illness. Greater convalescent titers and more frequent fourfold increases in antibody titers were observed in infants aged 6 months or more at the time of infection than in younger infants. At one year after primary infection, IgA and IgM specific antibody was undetectable, and IgG antibody was absent or present in low titer. Subsequent reinfection resulted in accelerated antibody response in all three classes of serum immunoglobulin. High titers of RSV-specific IgG, IgM, and IgA antibody were detectable at five and seven days after reinfection. These observations may explain the relatively mild nature of clinical illness associated with RSV reinfections in childhood.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)808-813
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Pediatrics
Volume96
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1980

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The antibody response to primary and secondary infection with respiratory syncytial virus: Kinetics of class-specific responses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this