Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The 2000 Presidential Election Controversy Manoj Mate And Matthew Wright

  • University of California at Berkeley

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

The Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore (2000) may have decided the disputed 2000 presidential election, but in its immediate aftermath, the controversy lived on in the divisions the case caused in public opinion toward the Court itself. This chapter follows a long line of scholarship that measures the public's trust, confidence, and support for the Court in the wake of controversial decisions. The chapter analyzes data from the 2000 and 2004 National Annenberg Election Studies, which provide various measures of support for the Supreme Court both immediately before and after Bush v. Gore. The findings of short-term polarization immediately following Bush v. Gore, which recedes completely four years later, attests to the resiliency of popular attitudes toward the Court even in the face of its most "legitimacy-threatening" decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPublic Opinion and Constitutional Controversy
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780199851720
ISBN (Print)9780195329414
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 3 2011

Keywords

  • 2000 election
  • Bush v. gore
  • National annenberg election studies
  • Supreme court

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The 2000 Presidential Election Controversy Manoj Mate And Matthew Wright'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this