Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Talimogene laherparepvec in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone for advanced melanoma: 5-year final analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial

  • Jason A. Chesney
  • , Igor Puzanov
  • , Frances A. Collichio
  • , Parminder Singh
  • , Mohammed M. Milhem
  • , John Glaspy
  • , Omid Hamid
  • , Merrick Ross
  • , Philip Friedlander
  • , Claus Garbe
  • , Theodore Logan
  • , Axel Hauschild
  • , Celeste Lebbé
  • , Harshada Joshi
  • , Wendy Snyder
  • , Janice M. Mehnert
  • University of Louisville
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Mayo Clinic Arizona
  • University of Iowa
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • University of Tübingen
  • Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
  • Kiel University
  • Université Paris Cité
  • PAREXEL International
  • Amgen Incorporated
  • New York University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

78 Scopus citations

Abstract

Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) plus ipilimumab has demonstrated greater antitumor activity versus ipilimumab alone, without additional toxicity, in patients with advanced melanoma. Here, we report the 5-year outcomes from a randomized phase II study. These data provide the longest efficacy and safety follow-up for patients with melanoma treated with a combination of an oncolytic virus and a checkpoint inhibitor. Eligible patients with unresectable stage IIIB-IV melanoma were randomized 1:1 to receive T-VEC plus ipilimumab or ipilimumab alone. T-VEC was administered intralesionally at 10 6 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL in week 1, followed by 10 8 PFU/mL in week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter. Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks; ≤4 doses) was administered intravenously starting at week 1 in the ipilimumab arm and week 6 in the combination arm. The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per immune-related response criteria; key secondary end points included durable response rate (DRR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Overall, 198 patients were randomized to receive the combination (n=98) or ipilimumab (n=100). The combination improved the ORR versus ipilimumab (35.7% vs 16.0%; OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.5 to 5.7; p=0.003). DRR was 33.7% and 13.0% (unadjusted OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.7 to 7.0; descriptive p=0.001), respectively. Among the objective responders, the median DOR was 69.2 months (95% CI 38.5 to not estimable) with the combination and was not reached with ipilimumab. Median PFS was 13.5 months with the combination and 6.4 months with ipilimumab (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.09; descriptive p=0.14). Estimated 5-year OS was 54.7% (95% CI 43.9 to 64.2) in the combination arm and 48.4% (95% CI 37.9 to 58.1) in the ipilimumab arm. Forty-seven (48.0%) and 65 (65.0%) patients in the combination and ipilimumab arms, respectively, received subsequent therapies. No new safety signals were reported. At the 5-year follow-up, the improved response rates observed with T-VEC plus ipilimumab were durable. This is the first randomized controlled study of the combination of an oncolytic virus and a checkpoint inhibitor that meets its primary end point.Trial registration number: NCT01740297.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberjitc-2022-006270
JournalJournal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2023

Keywords

  • immunotherapy
  • melanoma
  • oncolytic virotherapy
  • oncolytic viruses

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Talimogene laherparepvec in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone for advanced melanoma: 5-year final analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this