Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Super-long span bridge aerodynamics: First results of the numerical benchmark tests from task group 10

  • Ketil Aas-Jakobsen
  • , Andrew Allsop
  • , Igor Kavrakov
  • , Allan Larsen
  • , Ole Øiseth
  • , Tommaso Argentini
  • , Giorgio Diana
  • , Simone Omarini
  • , Daniele Rocchi
  • , Martin Svendsen
  • , Guy Larose
  • , Stoyan Stoyanoff
  • , Ho Kyung Kim
  • , Hernández
  • , Teng Wu
  • , Michael Andersen
  • , Hiroshi Katsuchi
  • Aas-Jakobsen
  • Arup Group
  • Bauhaus-Universität Weimar
  • COWI A/S
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  • Polytechnic University of Milan
  • Ramboll Foundation
  • Rowan Williams Davies and Irwin Inc.
  • Seoul National University
  • University of A Coruna
  • Svend Ole Hansen ApS
  • Yokohama National University

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The IABSE Task Group 10 (super-long span bridge aerodynamics) has the mandate to create a standard procedure for validation of methodology and software programs applied for stability and buffeting response analyses of super-long span bridges. Precise estimations of structural stability and response to strong winds are critical for the successful design of long-span bridges. Task Group 10 covers several important problems related to its mandate including: review and verification of methods developed and adopted by researchers and bridge designers; the definition of guidelines and sample tests for verification and calibration of analytical procedures; identification of fundamental problems of the computation methods; relevant input and output data. Since the beginning of its work, this working group has developed a 3-step benchmark, with multiple sub-steps of fundamental problems to resolve. The first step of this benchmark has been a numerical comparison of the results obtained using different models adopted across the workgroup members. Using the same inputs: flutter stability and the buffeting response of both a deck sectional model and a full bridge are studied. Step 2 will be the comparison of predicted results and experimental tests in wind tunnels, and Step 3 will be of validation against full scale measurements. In this paper, the results of Step 1 will be presented, highlighting critical issues and differences found during the comparison of results. The response of a 3-degrees of freedom bridge deck will be presented both in terms of aeroelastic stability and buffeting response. The results presented are intended to be a reference for the validation of methodologies and software programs that solve for wind response of bridges.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIABSE Symposium, Nantes 2018
Subtitle of host publicationTomorrow's Megastructures
PublisherInternational Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
PagesS34-71-S34-82
ISBN (Electronic)9783857481611
StatePublished - 2018
Event40th IABSE Symposium in Nantes 2018: Tomorrow's Megastructures - Nantes, France
Duration: Sep 19 2018Sep 21 2018

Publication series

NameIABSE Symposium, Nantes 2018: Tomorrow's Megastructures

Conference

Conference40th IABSE Symposium in Nantes 2018: Tomorrow's Megastructures
Country/TerritoryFrance
CityNantes
Period09/19/1809/21/18

Keywords

  • Aeroelasticity
  • Benchmark
  • Buffeting
  • Flutter
  • Long-span bridge

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Super-long span bridge aerodynamics: First results of the numerical benchmark tests from task group 10'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this