Super-long span bridge aerodynamics benchmark: Additional results for TG3.1 Step 1.2

Giorgio Diana; Stoyan Stoyanoff; Andrew Allsop; Luca Amerio; Tommaso Argentini; Miguel Cid Montoya; Vincent de Ville; Michael Stirk Andersen; Teng Wu; Santiago Hernández; José Ángel Jurado; Igor Kavrakov; Guy Larose; Allan Larsen; Guido Morgenthal; Simone Omarini; Daniele Rocchi; Martin Svendsen

Super-long span bridge aerodynamics benchmark: Additional results for TG3.1 Step 1.2

Giorgio Diana
, Stoyan Stoyanoff
, Andrew Allsop
, Luca Amerio
, Tommaso Argentini
, Miguel Cid Montoya
, Vincent de Ville
, Michael Stirk Andersen
, Teng Wu
, Santiago Hernández
, José Ángel Jurado
, Igor Kavrakov
, Guy Larose
, Allan Larsen
, Guido Morgenthal
, Simone Omarini
, Daniele Rocchi
, Martin Svendsen

Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering

Polytechnic University of Milan
Rowan Williams Davies and Irwin Inc.
Arup Group
University of A Coruna
Greisch
Svend Ole Hansen ApS
Bauhaus-Universität Weimar
COWI A/S
Ramboll Foundation

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

Abstract

This paper presents the ongoing benchmark results of IABSE Task Group 3.1. The task of this working group is to create benchmark results for the validation of methodologies and software programs developed to assess the stability and the buffeting response of long span bridges. Indeed, accurate estimations of structural stability and response to strong winds are critical for the successful design of long-span bridges. While the first results of the benchmark, dealing with a section approach, have been already published, in this paper the ongoing activity and results of the task group are presented. The topic of these results is the numerical response of a full-bridge model under the actions of a multi-correlated wind field both in terms of aeroelastic stability and buffeting response.

Original language	English
Pages	1982-1989
Number of pages	8
State	Published - 2021
Event	IABSE Congress, Ghent 2021: Structural Engineering for Future Societal Needs - Ghent, Virtual, Belgium Duration: Sep 22 2021 → Sep 24 2021

Conference

Conference	IABSE Congress, Ghent 2021: Structural Engineering for Future Societal Needs
Country/Territory	Belgium
City	Ghent, Virtual
Period	09/22/21 → 09/24/21

Keywords

Aeroelasticity
Benchmark
Buffeting
Flutter
Long-span bridge

Cite this

Diana, G., Stoyanoff, S., Allsop, A., Amerio, L., Argentini, T., Cid Montoya, M., de Ville, V., Andersen, M. S., Wu, T., Hernández, S., Jurado, J. Á., Kavrakov, I., Larose, G., Larsen, A., Morgenthal, G., Omarini, S., Rocchi, D., & Svendsen, M. (2021). Super-long span bridge aerodynamics benchmark: Additional results for TG3.1 Step 1.2. 1982-1989. Paper presented at IABSE Congress, Ghent 2021: Structural Engineering for Future Societal Needs, Ghent, Virtual, Belgium.

@conference{b6d135327914420daaa49c7fcb3e721a,

title = "Super-long span bridge aerodynamics benchmark: Additional results for TG3.1 Step 1.2",

abstract = "This paper presents the ongoing benchmark results of IABSE Task Group 3.1. The task of this working group is to create benchmark results for the validation of methodologies and software programs developed to assess the stability and the buffeting response of long span bridges. Indeed, accurate estimations of structural stability and response to strong winds are critical for the successful design of long-span bridges. While the first results of the benchmark, dealing with a section approach, have been already published, in this paper the ongoing activity and results of the task group are presented. The topic of these results is the numerical response of a full-bridge model under the actions of a multi-correlated wind field both in terms of aeroelastic stability and buffeting response.",

keywords = "Aeroelasticity, Benchmark, Buffeting, Flutter, Long-span bridge",

author = "Giorgio Diana and Stoyan Stoyanoff and Andrew Allsop and Luca Amerio and Tommaso Argentini and \{Cid Montoya\}, Miguel and \{de Ville\}, Vincent and Andersen, \{Michael Stirk\} and Teng Wu and Santiago Hern{\'a}ndez and Jurado, \{Jos{\'e} {\'A}ngel\} and Igor Kavrakov and Guy Larose and Allan Larsen and Guido Morgenthal and Simone Omarini and Daniele Rocchi and Martin Svendsen",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 IABSE Congress, Ghent 2021: Structural Engineering for Future Societal Needs. All rights reserved.; IABSE Congress, Ghent 2021: Structural Engineering for Future Societal Needs ; Conference date: 22-09-2021 Through 24-09-2021",

year = "2021",

language = "English",

pages = "1982--1989",

}

Diana, G, Stoyanoff, S, Allsop, A, Amerio, L, Argentini, T, Cid Montoya, M, de Ville, V, Andersen, MS, Wu, T, Hernández, S, Jurado, JÁ, Kavrakov, I, Larose, G, Larsen, A, Morgenthal, G, Omarini, S, Rocchi, D & Svendsen, M 2021, 'Super-long span bridge aerodynamics benchmark: Additional results for TG3.1 Step 1.2', Paper presented at IABSE Congress, Ghent 2021: Structural Engineering for Future Societal Needs, Ghent, Virtual, Belgium, 09/22/21 - 09/24/21 pp. 1982-1989.

TY - CONF

T1 - Super-long span bridge aerodynamics benchmark

T2 - IABSE Congress, Ghent 2021: Structural Engineering for Future Societal Needs

AU - Diana, Giorgio

AU - Stoyanoff, Stoyan

AU - Allsop, Andrew

AU - Amerio, Luca

AU - Argentini, Tommaso

AU - Cid Montoya, Miguel

AU - de Ville, Vincent

AU - Andersen, Michael Stirk

AU - Wu, Teng

AU - Hernández, Santiago

AU - Jurado, José Ángel

AU - Kavrakov, Igor

AU - Larose, Guy

AU - Larsen, Allan

AU - Morgenthal, Guido

AU - Omarini, Simone

AU - Rocchi, Daniele

AU - Svendsen, Martin

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - This paper presents the ongoing benchmark results of IABSE Task Group 3.1. The task of this working group is to create benchmark results for the validation of methodologies and software programs developed to assess the stability and the buffeting response of long span bridges. Indeed, accurate estimations of structural stability and response to strong winds are critical for the successful design of long-span bridges. While the first results of the benchmark, dealing with a section approach, have been already published, in this paper the ongoing activity and results of the task group are presented. The topic of these results is the numerical response of a full-bridge model under the actions of a multi-correlated wind field both in terms of aeroelastic stability and buffeting response.

AB - This paper presents the ongoing benchmark results of IABSE Task Group 3.1. The task of this working group is to create benchmark results for the validation of methodologies and software programs developed to assess the stability and the buffeting response of long span bridges. Indeed, accurate estimations of structural stability and response to strong winds are critical for the successful design of long-span bridges. While the first results of the benchmark, dealing with a section approach, have been already published, in this paper the ongoing activity and results of the task group are presented. The topic of these results is the numerical response of a full-bridge model under the actions of a multi-correlated wind field both in terms of aeroelastic stability and buffeting response.

KW - Aeroelasticity

KW - Benchmark

KW - Buffeting

KW - Flutter

KW - Long-span bridge

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85119037326

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:85119037326

SP - 1982

EP - 1989

Y2 - 22 September 2021 through 24 September 2021

ER -

Super-long span bridge aerodynamics benchmark: Additional results for TG3.1 Step 1.2

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this