Abstract
Descriptions of significant associations found from a logistic regression analysis typically are based on adjusted odds ratios. Unfortunately, odds ratios provide no information about the prevalence of response. In this paper, we justify and recommend using standardized risks, i.e., standardized probabilities, which do provide information about prevalence, in addition to adjusted odds ratios, for pairwise comparisons of the levels of a significant factor. We illustrate the advantages of generally reporting standardized risk estimates, in the context of assessing the effect of blood lead levels during the preschool years on occurrence of academic problems in kindergarten. Results are more meaningfully interpreted when accompanied by standardized risk estimates.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 54-66 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Biometrical Journal |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2006 |
Keywords
- Academic problems
- Adjusted odds ratios
- Binary response models
- Lead poisoning
- Logistic regression
- Post hoc comparisons
- Standardized attributable risk
- Standardized proportions
- Standardized risk
- Standardized risk difference
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Standardized risk and description of results from multivariable modeling of a binary response'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver